Half banana
As I said before the majority of the world (or the US for that matter) never did accept the Bible as being from God.
I think you know logic is much more than just an abstract noun, and the fact that people don't want to think about it's origin, doesn't change anything. We depend on logic everyday to make sense out of the world.
You appealed to logic when you said: "The reason being that spiritual things by nature have no tangible or concrete evidence for them and therefore cannot form the basis from which logical conclusions can be drawn." When questioned about logic, you seem to imply it doesn't really exist.
You also asked: "why would anyone with the internet still want to put faith in the Bible"? Why do you put so much..."faith" in logic when it's neither material or immaterial?
Using your reasoning, there is nothing "tangible or concrete" about logic.
I used the word transcendent to describe logic, what word or words would you use? We both believe it exists don't we?
“Agnosticism is epistemologically self-contradictory on its own assumptions because its claim to make no assertion about ultimate reality rests upon a most comprehensive assertion about ultimate reality.”
-- Cornelius Van Til